Why is it with NewPope rejecting a 1600 year tradition in Roman Catholic ligurgy?
Question: Why is it with NewPope rejecting a 1600 year tradition in Roman Catholic ligurgy?
Newchurch bishops sported papally-approved “Gay-Pride” vestments in rainbow color at 1997′s World Youth Day in Paris, France. “Traditional” Benedict-Ratzinger has now mandated “Gay” rainbow vestments on three new Sunday-holydays in the Novus Ordo Calendar for Saints Noe, Abraham, and Moses.
Benedict-Ratzinger has mandated for his Newchurch of the New Order during this new liturgical year of 2010 a new vestment color: “rainbow” (which is actually seven colors). The rainbow color is associated world wide with the immoral “gay-pride” movement, which advocates one of the Four Sins that Cry out to Heaven for Vengeance. Benedict-Ratzinger personally ratified the use of the “gay” rainbow color upon his return from his Africa junket, March 17-23, 2009.
Traditional liturgical colors are only five: white, black, violet, red, and green. Rose is a lightened violet optionally used on Gaudete and Laetare Sundays. By exception gold may be substituted for any color but black and violet, silver for the color white. Blue is not a true liturgical color, but an exception allowed to only one order and on one day. Multicolored vestments with none of the five colors predominating have been prohibited in the Roman Church for 1600 years.
Rainbow-colored chasubles and stoles are to be used by Novus Ordo presbyters and lay-deacons for the 34th, 35th, and 36th Sundays of Ordinary Time, as the Novus Ordo calls them, which, by papal decree will be replaced with three Sunday-holydays fabricated for the “Covenant of God and His people”: of St. Noe (called by Newchurch Noah), St. Abraham, and St. Moses.
In 1997 rainbow chasubles were officially approved for use at JPII’s World Youth Day in Paris, France, that year. Subsequently Newchurch’s Congregation for the Divine Cult and Discipline of the Sacraments allowed it to be used world wide ad experimentum. Since consulting Newbishops and liturgiac “experts,” the Congregation has received rave reviews of the rainbow color, and Newrome’s last Synod of Bishops officially approved stoles and chasubles in rainbow for the three new holydays by a vote of 256-2-1.
Good Catholics, it is clear that Benedict-Ratzinger is using the rainbow-colored vestments as a symbolic way of indicating his approval of “gay pride,” while in words he mildly objects. That is the modus operandi of the Great Cover-up Artist that we have come to expect. It all fits with the Modernist programme of this cult-member of the New Order, whom the deaf, dumb, and blind ignorantly call “traditional.” The intelligent, however, see the real score.
Answer:
Answer by Sleazy P. Martini
I don’t trust this Joey Rats fellow. He looks like a zombie. I think that he’s only in it for the brains.
I was raised Catholic, I know how they operate.
-S.P. Martini
lol
Show links and photos or it did not happen.
If it’s not feminists claiming that God is a She, or Soviets claiming they invented everything, it’s gays claiming old traditions are all support for them!
What did the gays ever do to you haters?
How does their “sin” affect you?
I really doubt that a conservative religious figure would intend to do that, even if he was in favor of equality.
I thought God invented the rainbow after the Flood…
It turns out that the story about the Vatican approving rainbow vestments was basically the french version of an April Fool’s joke. The diocese of Saint Brieuc-Treguier explains the “joke” on its website. Mainly the fabricated details include things like being used on feasts of “St. Noah” and “St. Abraham” which don’t exist.” However, the truth is that rainbow vestments were introduced at World Youth Day in 1997 in Paris without anyone’s approval at all. So the fact is, rainbow vestments are being warn at Mass and it’s no joke. They may not be as glaring as the picture below, but you’ll get the picture in the video. So the pope and the Vatican apparently never approved of rainbow vestments. The French bishops made the decision all on their own. So you may still want to write to the Congregation in charge of the liturgy and complain about the practice of priests wearing vestments with the symbol of “gay” pride. It’s no joke!
================================================================================================================================================
There are a few though which you have made spurious claims about. Looking at the ones I do know about makes me question the opinions you have on other ones. If you can add 2 +2 and come up with 5 with some of the photos, then it cast doubts on your other works.
For instance you talk about a mass in France in which the chasubles have a rainbow pattern. You immediately associate that with the homosexual community. This maybe true of the US but when I visited the US in the 1990s I had to be told that the Rainbow flag represented the Homosexual community.
As a European the rainbow is the color of many different groups, e.g. a peace group which has Pace written across the flag, and secondly, the International Co-operative group which only recently changed its flag because of the American Homosexual flag.
It is true that nowadays the rainbow flag is being used in Europe but it has taken a while for it to be associated in peoples minds with Homosexuality.
This leads your comment on the chasubles to be wrong. In 1997 there was no connection with the rainbow and the Homosexuals in a European mind. And I would say that if you did a survey in Europe on the Rainbow you would still find many people associating it with many different groups
Simply: the rainbow symbolized a very important Biblical event (the end of the flood and God’s promise to Noah) for centuries before being associated with anything as lame as “gay pride”. Benny16 isn’t promoting gay pride – he’s promoting God. I admire someone for refusing to allow homosexuals to re-define words or symbols. If a sufficient number of people had been persistent in using “gay” as a synonym for “happy” instead of avoiding it’s use because of its less palatable and less common meaning, we would not be talking about “gay pride” at all. If enough people use the rainbow as a symbol for something morally upstanding rather than “gay pride”, homosexuals will eventually choose an alternate symbol simply because people will not recognize the rainbow as a gay-associated symbol. That IS the preferable outcome.
Benny16 is doing something good here. Don’t knock it.
Jim, http://www.bible-reviews.com
Thanks for showing the world some more of this foolishness of this witchcraft idolatrous thing calling itself a church.
Thank God for giving me enough understanding to study the Word of God for myself and not depend on those wicked men to lead me. thank God for His precious Word of Truth.
Such WITCHCRAFT!
same answer as I gave in your last Q Dear, yet another “popular vote” plea for their up coming sun day law, the more they get of the different groups, the better, according to them…BTW their sun day law has already begun..in Germany, they start over in Europe then proceed worldwide..Peace/Love & God Bless
You do realize that God gave Noah a sign that he would not flood the world again and that sign was a rainbow. Genesis chapter 9: 16-17
The rainbow has been a symbol of God’s covenant w/ humanity since the days of Noah. It is only recently that it has been adopted by the Gay Pride folks. I’d say the church as 1st dibs. Concerning the other stuff I think it falls w/in the pope’s purview to make changes to the church calendar.
I’m not Catholic so I say why does it really matter?
Holy mackerel…
The color of the Vatican is yellow and white since day one. I think you made this up or concocted an idea. It is purely not the objective of the church to resemble the gay’s color. The Vcolors are already in place even before this gay group came out of nowhere. It is the gay who by chance choose to resembles the vestments’ color.
This is all fullfillment of Scripture in Daniel 11:37 – no desire of women- Clearly this is homosexuality encouraged – hence like daniel said the Anti Christ would be a Homo.
Also the coincidence of the prophesy from the 12th century that the 112th Pope will defect. Meaning he will go against the traditional teachings, Benedict is just paving the way for the next pope.